GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260M 260M SLI 280M 280M SLI 285M 285M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285M SLI with GeForce GTX 460 OEM, including specs and performance data.

GTX 285M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.81
+36.1%

285M SLI outperforms 460 OEM by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 285M SLI GTX 285M SLI
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking751827
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.951.43
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXGF104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (16 years ago)11 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256336
Core clock speed576 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data36.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8736 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data108.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
+50%
40−45
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Fortnite 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Valorant 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+38%
50−55
−38%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Dota 2 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Fortnite 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Valorant 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Dota 2 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Valorant 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Valorant 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Valorant 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how GTX 285M SLI and GTX 460 OEM compete in popular games:

  • GTX 285M SLI is 50% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.81 2.80
Recency 2 March 2009 11 October 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm

GTX 285M SLI has a 36.1% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 460 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
Radeon 540X Radeon 540X
GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
ATI HD 5750 Radeon HD 5750
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
Radeon 630 Radeon 630
HD 6790 HD 6790
vs
W5170M W5170M
HD 6790 HD 6790
vs
Pro 570 Pro 570
HD 6790 HD 6790
vs
GeForce MX130 MX130
HD 6790 HD 6790
vs
Playstation 4 Slim GPU Playstation 4 Slim GPU
GTX 285M SLI GTX 285M SLI
vs
NVS 140M NVS 140M
GTX 285M SLI 285M SLI
vs
RTX 5090 D 5090 D
HD 6970M HD 6970M
vs
HD 8450G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
HD 6970M HD 6970M
vs
GTX 950A GTX 950A
HD 6970M HD 6970M
vs
GT 415 OEM GT 415 OEM
HD 6970M HD 6970M
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M SLI or GeForce GTX 460 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.