Radeon HD 6570M vs GeForce GTX 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260 Core 216 Rev. 2 260 Rev. 2 275 275 PhysX Edition 285 285 Mac Edition 285 X2 295 295 Single PCB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6510G2 6515G2 6520G 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 6530M 6540G2 6545G2 6550A 6550M 6570M 6570M Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285 with Radeon HD 6570M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 285
2008, $359
1 GB GDDR3, 204 Watt
3.53
+161%

GTX 285 outperforms HD 6570M by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 285 GTX 285
HD 6570M HD 6570M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7781055
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.26no data
Power efficiency1.333.47
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT200BCapilano
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 December 2008 (17 years ago)26 November 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240400
Core clock speed648 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt30 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate51.8413.00
Floating-point processing power0.7085 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8020
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-II
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1242 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth159.0 GB/s57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+150%
24
−150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 285 and HD 6570M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 285 is 150% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.53 1.35
Recency 23 December 2008 26 November 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 30 Watt

GTX 285 has a 161% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 6570M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 580% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 285 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6570M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 6570M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
GT 740 GeForce GT 740
HD 6570M Radeon HD 6570M
vs
R5 (Stoney Ridge) Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
ATI HD 4890 Radeon HD 4890
GTX 285 NVIDIA GTX 285
vs
W5170M W5170M
GTX 285 NVIDIA GTX 285
vs
HD 8280 8280
GTX 285 NVIDIA GTX 285
vs
HD 8240 8240
GTX 285 NVIDIA GTX 285
vs
HD 8670D 8670D
GTX 285 NVIDIA GTX 285
vs
HD 7480D 7480D
GTX 285 NVIDIA GTX 285
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5750 5750
GTX 285 NVIDIA GTX 285
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5145 5145
GTX 285 NVIDIA GTX 285
vs
HD 8510 OEM 8510 OEM
GTX 285 NVIDIA GTX 285
vs
HD 8450 OEM 8450 OEM
GTX 285 NVIDIA GTX 285
vs
E9260 PCIe E9260 PCIe

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 115 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285 or Radeon HD 6570M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.