ATI Radeon 9000 PRO vs GeForce GTX 280M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1038not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.40no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameG92BRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 March 2009 (16 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed585 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors754 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate37.441.100
Floating-point processing power0.3745 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops562no data
ROPs164
TMUs644
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-HEAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 950 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth61 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 280M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO, on the other hand, has 167.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M and Radeon 9000 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9000 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
GeForce GTX 280M
ATI Radeon 9000 PRO
Radeon 9000 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 280M or Radeon 9000 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.