ATI Radeon 7000 vs GeForce GTX 280M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10501607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.41no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameG92BRV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 March 2009 (17 years ago)19 February 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed585 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors754 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate37.440.55
Floating-point processing power0.3745 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops562no data
ROPs161
TMUs643
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-HEAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 950 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth61 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 280M 651
+32450%
Samples: 66
ATI 7000 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
Valorant 5−6 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 7−8 no data

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 280M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 226% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7000 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 200 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 280M or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.