Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs GeForce GTX 280M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking981not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.36no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG92Viola
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 March 2009 (15 years ago)7 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1283840
Core clock speed585 MHz2180 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors754 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt232 Watt
Texture fill rate37.44564.0
Floating-point processing power0.3745 TFLOPS36.1 TFLOPS
Gigaflops562no data
ROPs1664
TMUs64240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-IVno data
Lengthno data386 mm
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 950 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth61 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 7 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 232 Watt

GTX 280M has 209.3% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M is a notebook card while Playstation 5 Pro GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
GeForce GTX 280M
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 59 votes

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.