ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 vs GeForce GTX 280M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1050not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.41no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameG92BR100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 March 2009 (17 years ago)31 July 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed585 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors754 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate37.441
Floating-point processing power0.3745 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops562no data
ROPs162
TMUs646
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 950 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth61 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA1x DVI, 2x S-Video
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 31 July 2000
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm

GTX 280M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M and All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 280M or All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.