GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs GTX 280
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460 OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 280 outperforms 460 OEM by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 796 | 826 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.10 | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.00 | 1.43 |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
GPU code name | GT200 | GF104 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 (17 years ago) | 11 October 2010 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 240 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 650 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 150 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 48.16 | 36.40 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.8736 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 32 | 32 |
TMUs | 80 | 56 |
L1 Cache | no data | 448 KB |
L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 210 mm |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 850 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | HDTVDual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
HDMI | - | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.91 | 2.66 |
Recency | 16 June 2008 | 11 October 2010 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 150 Watt |
GTX 280 has a 9.4% higher aggregate performance score.
GTX 460 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 57.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460 OEM.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.