Radeon RX Vega 11 vs GeForce GTX 275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 275 and Radeon RX Vega 11, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 275
2009
896 MB GDDR3, 219 Watt
3.67

RX Vega 11 outperforms GTX 275 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking676574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.350.73
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameGT200BVega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 January 2009 (15 years ago)26 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data
Current price$82 (0.3x MSRP)$475

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 11 has 109% better value for money than GTX 275.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240704
CUDA cores240no data
Core clock speed633 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1240 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate50.6 billion/sec61.60
Floating-point performance673.9 gflops1,760 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount896 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width448 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1134 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.04.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 275 3.67
RX Vega 11 5.49
+49.6%

Radeon RX Vega 11 outperforms GeForce GTX 275 by 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 275 1416
RX Vega 11 2120
+49.7%

Radeon RX Vega 11 outperforms GeForce GTX 275 by 50% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−61.1%
29
+61.1%
1440p4−5
−50%
6
+50%
4K8−9
−50%
12
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
−35%
27−30
+35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Battlefield 5 23
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 22
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
−40%
35−40
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 38
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Hitman 3 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Metro Exodus 33
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
−35%
27−30
+35%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 4 78
−41%
110−120
+41%
Hitman 3 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Metro Exodus 8
−25%
10−11
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 29
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Hitman 3 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4
−25%
5−6
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5
−40%
7−8
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

This is how GTX 275 and RX Vega 11 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 61% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 11 is 50% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 11 is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.67 5.49
Recency 15 January 2009 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 65 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 275 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GTX 275
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 132 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1696 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.