Radeon RX 6600M vs GeForce GTX 275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260 Core 216 Rev. 2 260 Rev. 2 275 275 PhysX Edition 285 285 Mac Edition 285 X2 295 295 Single PCB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 275 with Radeon RX 6600M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 275
2009, $249
896 MB GDDR3, 219 Watt
3.23

6600M outperforms GTX 275 by a whopping 929% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 275 GTX 275
RX 6600M RX 6600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking794175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31no data
Power efficiency1.1325.56
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 January 2009 (17 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2401792
Core clock speed633 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2416 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate50.64270.6
Floating-point processing power0.6739 TFLOPS8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs2864
TMUs80112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache224 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount896 MB8 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.04.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 275 3.23
RX 6600M 33.24
+929%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 275 1351
Samples: 805
RX 6600M 13901
+929%
Samples: 890

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−1011%
100
+1011%
1440p5−6
−980%
54
+980%
4K2−3
−1400%
30
+1400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p27.67no data
1440p49.80no data
4K124.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+0%
107
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 100
+0%
100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+0%
83
+0%
Far Cry 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+0%
202
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 121
+0%
121
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 86
+0%
86
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 199
+0%
199
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 116
+0%
116
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 68
+0%
68
+0%
Metro Exodus 80
+0%
80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+0%
168
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 52
+0%
52
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+0%
61
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+0%
128
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 36
+0%
36
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Dota 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+0%
74
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how GTX 275 and RX 6600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is 1011% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600M is 980% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600M is 1400% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.23 33.24
Recency 15 January 2009 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 100 Watt

RX 6600M has a 929.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 814.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 119% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 275 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 275 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 6600M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GTX 275
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600M
vs
RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
GTX 280 GeForce GTX 280
GTX 275 GTX 275
vs
Riva TNT2 Ultra Riva TNT2 Ultra
GTX 275 275
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q 1650 Max-Q
GTX 275 GTX 275
vs
UHD Graphics 910 UHD Graphics 910
GTX 275 GTX 275
vs
Graphics 448SP Graphics 448SP
GTX 275 GTX 275
vs
UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4
GTX 275 GTX 275
vs
T400 T400
GTX 275 GTX 275
vs
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
GTX 275 GTX 275
vs
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
GTX 275 GTX 275
vs
L20 L20
GTX 275 GTX 275
vs
RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 142 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1112 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 275 or Radeon RX 6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.