GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs GTX 275

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 275 and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 275
2009
896 MB GDDR3, 219 Watt
3.67

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTX 275 by a whopping 2016% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking6768
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3533.15
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGT200BAD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 January 2009 (15 years ago)17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $699
Current price$82 (0.3x MSRP)$719 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 SUPER has 9371% better value for money than GTX 275.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2407168
CUDA cores240no data
Core clock speed633 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt220 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate50.6 billion/sec584.6
Floating-point performance673.9 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)285 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 16-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount896 MB12 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.04.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 275 3.67
RTX 4070 SUPER 77.64
+2016%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTX 275 by 2016% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 275 1416
RTX 4070 SUPER 29984
+2018%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTX 275 by 2018% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−2211%
208
+2211%
1440p6−7
−2167%
136
+2167%
4K3−4
−2667%
83
+2667%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
−2014%
2600−2650
+2014%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
−1986%
2900−2950
+1986%
Battlefield 5 240−250
−2011%
5150−5200
+2011%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−1983%
2500−2550
+1983%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−1976%
2450−2500
+1976%
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
−2013%
4100−4150
+2013%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−2001%
5000−5050
+2001%
Hitman 3 120−130
−2014%
2600−2650
+2014%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−2004%
6900−6950
+2004%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−2009%
3100−3150
+2009%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−1997%
2600−2650
+1997%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 434
−2008%
9150−9200
+2008%
Watch Dogs: Legion 169
−2001%
3550−3600
+2001%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
−2014%
2600−2650
+2014%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
−1986%
2900−2950
+1986%
Battlefield 5 240−250
−2011%
5150−5200
+2011%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−1983%
2500−2550
+1983%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−1976%
2450−2500
+1976%
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
−2013%
4100−4150
+2013%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−2001%
5000−5050
+2001%
Hitman 3 120−130
−2014%
2600−2650
+2014%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−2004%
6900−6950
+2004%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−2009%
3100−3150
+2009%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−1997%
2600−2650
+1997%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 428
−2014%
9050−9100
+2014%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 412
−2012%
8700−8750
+2012%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−2013%
3000−3050
+2013%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
−2014%
2600−2650
+2014%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
−1986%
2900−2950
+1986%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−1983%
2500−2550
+1983%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−1976%
2450−2500
+1976%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−2001%
5000−5050
+2001%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−2004%
6900−6950
+2004%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 381
−2013%
8050−8100
+2013%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 201
−2014%
4250−4300
+2014%
Watch Dogs: Legion 139
−1986%
2900−2950
+1986%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−1997%
2600−2650
+1997%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
−2008%
3500−3550
+2008%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−1983%
3000−3050
+1983%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
−1965%
1900−1950
+1965%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
−2000%
2100−2150
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−1972%
2300−2350
+1972%
Far Cry 5 183
−2004%
3850−3900
+2004%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−1992%
4100−4150
+1992%
Hitman 3 110−120
−2005%
2400−2450
+2005%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−2012%
4350−4400
+2012%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−1997%
2600−2650
+1997%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 265
−2013%
5600−5650
+2013%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
−2010%
3250−3300
+2010%
Watch Dogs: Legion 108
−1983%
2250−2300
+1983%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−1990%
2550−2600
+1990%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−2002%
1850−1900
+2002%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−2001%
1450−1500
+2001%
Hitman 3 70−75
−1971%
1450−1500
+1971%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−1980%
2600−2650
+1980%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94
−1974%
1950−2000
+1974%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133
−2005%
2800−2850
+2005%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−1990%
1400−1450
+1990%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−2009%
1350−1400
+2009%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−2015%
1100−1150
+2015%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−2000%
1050−1100
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−1995%
3100−3150
+1995%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−1980%
2600−2650
+1980%
Metro Exodus 95−100
−2005%
2000−2050
+2005%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−1997%
1300−1350
+1997%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−2011%
1900−1950
+2011%

This is how GTX 275 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 2211% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 2167% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 2667% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.67 77.64
Recency 15 January 2009 17 January 2024
Cost $249 $699
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 220 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 275 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GTX 275
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 132 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1890 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.