GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GTX 275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 OEM GTX 260 Rev. 2 GTX 275 GTX 275 PhysX Edition GTX 285 GTX 285 Mac Edition GTX 285 X2 GTX 295 GTX 295 Single PCB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 275 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 275
2009
896 MB GDDR3, 219 Watt
3.59

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms GTX 275 by a whopping 464% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 275 GTX 275
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking728280
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.38no data
Power efficiency1.1227.75
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT200BTU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 January 2009 (16 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2401024
Core clock speed633 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate50.6495.04
Floating-point processing power0.6739 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs2832
TMUs8064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount896 MB4 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.04.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 275 3.59
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.23
+464%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 275 1382
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+464%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−510%
61
+510%
1440p8−9
−475%
46
+475%
4K4−5
−575%
27
+575%

Cost per frame, $

1080p24.90no data
1440p31.13no data
4K62.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 76
+0%
76
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 56
+0%
56
+0%
Battlefield 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Fortnite 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 181
+0%
181
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 34
+0%
34
+0%
Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Dota 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 180
+0%
180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 13
+0%
13
+0%

This is how GTX 275 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 510% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 475% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 575% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.59 20.23
Recency 15 January 2009 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 463.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 357.1% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 338% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 275 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 275 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GTX 275
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
GT 130 OEM GeForce GT 130 OEM
vs
530X Mobile Radeon 530X Mobile
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
GT 520MX GT 520MX
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
7950 GX2 GeForce 7950 GX2
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
Vega 8 Embedded Vega 8 Embedded
GT 120 Mac Edition GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
vs
RTX 3060 RTX 3060
GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
vs
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
vs
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo Rage PRO Turbo
9400 GT PCI GeForce 9400 GT PCI
vs
RTX 5080 RTX 5080
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
vs
ATI HD 3750 HD 3750
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
vs
RTX 4090 D RTX 4090 D

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 139 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1737 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 275 or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.