Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated735
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.35
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameGT200BBroadwell GT3e
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 February 2010 (15 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240384
Core clock speed633 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate50.6438.40
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs286
TMUs8048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount896 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width448 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1134 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.1.80
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 February 2010 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1360% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and Iris Pro Graphics P6300. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition or Iris Pro Graphics P6300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.