GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs Radeon HD 7950 Boost

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTahitiGT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 June 2012 (13 years ago)16 February 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792240
Core clock speed850 MHz633 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt219 Watt
Texture fill rate103.650.64
Floating-point processing power3.315 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs3228
TMUs11280
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length274 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB896 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/s127.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 June 2012 16 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 219 Watt

HD 7950 Boost has an age advantage of 2 years, a 242.9% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 9.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950 Boost and GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost
Radeon HD 7950 Boost
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 17 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7950 Boost or GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.