ATI Radeon 9500 PRO vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 260M SLI with Radeon 9500 PRO, including specs and performance data.


GTX 260M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.05
+2950%

260M SLI outperforms 9500 PRO by a whopping 2950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8141520
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.57no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXR300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (17 years ago)1 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores224no data
Core clock speed550 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million110 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data2.200
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz270 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.64 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 4−5 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Fortnite 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 30−33 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Fortnite 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 30−33 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 0−1
Valorant 27−30 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.05 0.10
Recency 2 March 2009 1 October 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

GTX 260M SLI has a 2950% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 173% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9500 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9500 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon 9500 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260M SLI or Radeon 9500 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.