Radeon HD 7400G vs GeForce GTX 260

Place in performance ranking	714	1135
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.36	0.01
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code name	GT200	Trinity
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	16 June 2008 (16 years ago)	1 September 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	no data
Current price	$49 (0.1x MSRP)	$338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 260 has 3500% better value for money than HD 7400G.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	192
CUDA cores	192	no data
Core clock speed	576 MHz	327 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	423 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	182 Watt	17 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	36.9 billion/sec	5.088
Floating-point performance	476.9 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon HD 7400G compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	448 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	999 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	111.9 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVIHDTV	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.0
OpenGL	2.1	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 260 3.17
+359%

HD 7400G 0.69

GeForce GTX 260 outperforms Radeon HD 7400G by 359% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 260 1223
+358%

HD 7400G 267

GeForce GTX 260 outperforms Radeon HD 7400G by 358% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

+300%

3−4
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +350%	10−11 −350%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +350%	10−11 −350%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +350%	10−11 −350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%