UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce GTX 1660

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660
2019
6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
26.09
+603%

GTX 1660 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs by a whopping 603% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking202696
Place by popularity49not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.36no data
Power efficiency17.25no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTU116Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 March 2019 (6 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140832
Core clock speed1530 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.1no data
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs88no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2001 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 26.09
+603%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 3.71

  • Other tests
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 21064
+534%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 3322

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 14164
+468%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 2493

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 81755
+553%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 12523

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD83
+419%
16
−419%
1440p50
+614%
7−8
−614%
4K27
+800%
3−4
−800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.64no data
1440p4.38no data
4K8.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 111
+693%
14−16
−693%
Counter-Strike 2 271
+674%
35−40
−674%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+610%
10−11
−610%
Atomic Heart 83
+730%
10−11
−730%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+494%
18
−494%
Counter-Strike 2 223
+643%
30−33
−643%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+625%
8−9
−625%
Far Cry 5 100
+614%
14
−614%
Fortnite 130−140
+478%
21−24
−478%
Forza Horizon 4 132
+595%
18−20
−595%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+614%
14−16
−614%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+559%
16−18
−559%
Valorant 306
+467%
50−55
−467%
Atomic Heart 49
+717%
6−7
−717%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+569%
16
−569%
Counter-Strike 2 107
+664%
14−16
−664%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+280%
70−75
−280%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+683%
6−7
−683%
Dota 2 219
+544%
34
−544%
Far Cry 5 92
+608%
13
−608%
Fortnite 130−140
+478%
21−24
−478%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+547%
18−20
−547%
Forza Horizon 5 88
+633%
12−14
−633%
Grand Theft Auto V 115
+785%
13
−785%
Metro Exodus 57
+850%
6
−850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+559%
16−18
−559%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+827%
10−12
−827%
Valorant 287
+431%
50−55
−431%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+613%
15
−613%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+700%
5−6
−700%
Dota 2 197
+535%
31
−535%
Far Cry 5 86
+617%
12
−617%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+416%
18−20
−416%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+559%
16−18
−559%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+418%
10−12
−418%
Valorant 115
+619%
16−18
−619%
Fortnite 130−140
+478%
21−24
−478%
Counter-Strike 2 62
+675%
8−9
−675%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+557%
30−33
−557%
Grand Theft Auto V 52
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Metro Exodus 33
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
+617%
18−20
−617%
Valorant 226
+426%
40−45
−426%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Far Cry 5 59
+743%
7−8
−743%
Forza Horizon 4 76
+660%
10−11
−660%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+717%
6−7
−717%
Fortnite 70−75
+775%
8−9
−775%
Atomic Heart 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
+206%
16−18
−206%
Metro Exodus 20
+900%
2−3
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+775%
4−5
−775%
Valorant 125
+525%
20−22
−525%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+900%
1−2
−900%
Dota 2 87
+569%
12−14
−569%
Far Cry 5 30
+650%
4−5
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+900%
5−6
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Fortnite 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%

This is how GTX 1660 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is 419% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 is 614% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 is 800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 is 7600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 surpassed UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in all 39 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.09 3.71
Recency 14 March 2019 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm

GTX 1660 has a 603.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1
5709 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.