Radeon RX Vega 9 vs GeForce GTX 1660

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 with Radeon RX Vega 9, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660
2019
6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
30.33
+443%

GTX 1660 outperforms RX Vega 9 by a whopping 443% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking187607
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.69no data
Power efficiency17.4425.71
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 March 2019 (5 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408576
Core clock speed1530 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate157.1no data
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs88no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2001 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 30.33
+443%
RX Vega 9 5.59

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 21064
+381%
RX Vega 9 4380

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 71229
+464%
RX Vega 9 12628

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 14164
+408%
RX Vega 9 2789

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 81755
+325%
RX Vega 9 19255

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 570753
+333%
RX Vega 9 131922

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD84
+300%
21
−300%
1440p51
+467%
9−10
−467%
4K27
+575%
4−5
−575%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.61no data
1440p4.29no data
4K8.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 72
+454%
12−14
−454%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+545%
10−12
−545%
Elden Ring 84
+500%
14−16
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+424%
16−18
−424%
Counter-Strike 2 56
+331%
12−14
−331%
Cyberpunk 2077 55
+400%
10−12
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 132
+474%
21−24
−474%
Metro Exodus 95
+579%
14−16
−579%
Red Dead Redemption 2 112
+559%
16−18
−559%
Valorant 138
+820%
14−16
−820%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+424%
16−18
−424%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+269%
12−14
−269%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+309%
10−12
−309%
Dota 2 150
+689%
18−20
−689%
Elden Ring 90
+543%
14−16
−543%
Far Cry 5 145
+458%
24−27
−458%
Fortnite 140−150
+336%
30−35
−336%
Forza Horizon 4 110
+378%
21−24
−378%
Grand Theft Auto V 115
+505%
18−20
−505%
Metro Exodus 66
+371%
14−16
−371%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 216
+468%
38
−468%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40
+135%
16−18
−135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+467%
18−20
−467%
Valorant 65
+333%
14−16
−333%
World of Tanks 270−280
+204%
90−95
−204%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+424%
16−18
−424%
Counter-Strike 2 43
+231%
12−14
−231%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+245%
10−12
−245%
Dota 2 197
+937%
18−20
−937%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+227%
24−27
−227%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+313%
21−24
−313%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+277%
45−50
−277%
Valorant 115
+667%
14−16
−667%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 52
+940%
5−6
−940%
Elden Ring 47
+571%
7−8
−571%
Grand Theft Auto V 52
+940%
5−6
−940%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
+269%
35−40
−269%
Red Dead Redemption 2 25
+525%
4−5
−525%
World of Tanks 190−200
+390%
40−45
−390%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+567%
9−10
−567%
Counter-Strike 2 26
+189%
9−10
−189%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+475%
4−5
−475%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+683%
12−14
−683%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+644%
9−10
−644%
Metro Exodus 59
+883%
6−7
−883%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Valorant 72
+380%
14−16
−380%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
Dota 2 49
+188%
16−18
−188%
Elden Ring 21
+600%
3−4
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
+188%
16−18
−188%
Metro Exodus 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 81
+406%
16−18
−406%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
+188%
16−18
−188%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Dota 2 87
+412%
16−18
−412%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
Fortnite 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 36
+620%
5−6
−620%
Valorant 38
+660%
5−6
−660%

This is how GTX 1660 and RX Vega 9 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is 300% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 is 467% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 is 575% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 is 1900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 surpassed RX Vega 9 in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.33 5.59
Recency 14 March 2019 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 1660 has a 442.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

RX Vega 9, on the other hand, has 700% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 9 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5462 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.