Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs GeForce GTX 1660

Place in performance ranking	170	49
Place by popularity	47	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.98	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Turing TU116	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	14 March 2019 (5 years ago)	17 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$219	$334
Current price	$252 (1.2x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	2560
Core clock speed	1530 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	157.1	413.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	229 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	192.1 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 30.27

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 51.09
+68.8%

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 by 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 11690

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 19731
+68.8%

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 by 69% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	84 −66.7%	140−150 +66.7%
1440p	50 −60%	80−85 +60%
4K	27 −66.7%	45−50 +66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−77.5%

71
+77.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −86.7%	55−60 +86.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −96.7%	59 +96.7%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −80%	95−100 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −82.5%	73 +82.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −93.3%	58 +93.3%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −70%	65−70 +70%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −71.1%	75−80 +71.1%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −76%	132 +76%
Hitman 3	40−45 −72.5%	69 +72.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −72%	172 +72%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −69.4%	144 +69.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −72.3%	112 +72.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −76%	132 +76%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −73.3%	78 +73.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −86.7%	55−60 +86.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −75%	42 +75%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −80%	95−100 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −91.4%	67 +91.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −74.1%	47 +74.1%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −70%	65−70 +70%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −71.1%	75−80 +71.1%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −78.6%	120−130 +78.6%
Hitman 3	30−33 −86.7%	56 +86.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −68.8%	287 +68.8%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −81.8%	100 +81.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −80%	90 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −69.2%	110 +69.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −70%	102 +70%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −78.3%	214 +78.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −86.7%	55−60 +86.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −76.2%	37 +76.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −81.5%	49 +81.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −90.5%	40 +90.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −70%	65−70 +70%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −78.2%	98 +78.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −69.1%	93 +69.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −72.7%	95 +72.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −90%	57 +90%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −81.3%	29 +81.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−80%

81
+80%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −90%	55−60 +90%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −71.1%	77 +71.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −77.8%	30−35 +77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −92.9%	27 +92.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −70%	51 +70%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −71.4%	24 +71.4%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −96.7%	59 +96.7%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −68.9%	76 +68.9%
Hitman 3	21−24 −85.7%	39 +85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −91.4%	67 +91.4%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −96.7%	59 +96.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −91.4%	67 +91.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −90%	19 +90%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

−76.7%

53
+76.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Hitman 3	12−14 −75%	21 +75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −71.4%	35−40 +71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −71.4%	24 +71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −94.4%	35 +94.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −90%	18−20 +90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −87.5%	15 +87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −70%	17 +70%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −100%	10 +100%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −85.2%	50 +85.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −81%	38 +81%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −72.2%	31 +72.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −71.4%	12 +71.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−85.7%

26
+85.7%

This is how GTX 1660 and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB compete in popular games:

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 67% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 60% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 67% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.27	51.09
Recency	14 March 2019	17 October 2023
Cost	$219	$334
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	250 Watt