ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs GeForce GTX 1660

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking230not rated
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.42no data
Power efficiency17.83no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameTU116R350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 March 2019 (7 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speed1530 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate157.13.040
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPSno data
ROPs488
TMUs888
L1 Cache1.4 MBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2001 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.1 GB/s21.76 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 March 2019 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 47 Watt

GTX 1660 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has 155% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6438 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.