ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs GeForce GTX 1630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking449not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.24no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameTU117R350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2022 (3 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed1740 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate57.123.040
Floating-point processing power1.828 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs328
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2022 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 47 Watt

GTX 1630 has an age advantage of 19 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has 59.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1630 and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit
Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1489 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1630 or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.