Radeon Pro W6800 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Radeon Pro W6800, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
28.89

Pro W6800 outperforms GTX 1660 Ti by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17359
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.8928.55
Power efficiency19.1014.12
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU116Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 February 2019 (6 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $2,249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti has 36% better value for money than Pro W6800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363840
Core clock speed1500 MHz2075 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2320 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate169.9556.8
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS17.82 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs96240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB32 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 Ti 28.89
Pro W6800 44.51
+54.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12909
Pro W6800 19891
+54.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Ti 22892
Pro W6800 44404
+94%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Ti 61217
Pro W6800 82458
+34.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti 16024
Pro W6800 27937
+74.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti 93095
+0.8%
Pro W6800 92363

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti 483604
+9.8%
Pro W6800 440592

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
−31.7%
137
+31.7%
1440p59
−96.6%
116
+96.6%
4K39
−115%
84
+115%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.68
+512%
16.42
−512%
1440p4.73
+310%
19.39
−310%
4K7.15
+274%
26.77
−274%
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 512% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 310% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 274% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
−64.4%
140−150
+64.4%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
−44.4%
260−270
+44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
−47.4%
110−120
+47.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
−64.4%
140−150
+64.4%
Battlefield 5 129
−15.5%
140−150
+15.5%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
−44.4%
260−270
+44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
−62%
110−120
+62%
Far Cry 5 109
+55.7%
70
−55.7%
Fortnite 247
+19.9%
200−210
−19.9%
Forza Horizon 4 131
−40.5%
180−190
+40.5%
Forza Horizon 5 107
−35.5%
140−150
+35.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200
+15.6%
170−180
−15.6%
Valorant 190−200
−35.9%
260−270
+35.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
−64.4%
140−150
+64.4%
Battlefield 5 112
−33%
140−150
+33%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
−44.4%
260−270
+44.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−1.1%
270−280
+1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
−102%
110−120
+102%
Dota 2 181
+82.8%
99
−82.8%
Far Cry 5 99
+52.3%
65
−52.3%
Fortnite 143
−44.1%
200−210
+44.1%
Forza Horizon 4 122
−50.8%
180−190
+50.8%
Forza Horizon 5 94
−54.3%
140−150
+54.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
−1.7%
121
+1.7%
Metro Exodus 55
−191%
160
+191%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150
−15.3%
170−180
+15.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
−71.6%
199
+71.6%
Valorant 190−200
−35.9%
260−270
+35.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
−46.1%
140−150
+46.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−150%
110−120
+150%
Dota 2 168
+95.3%
86
−95.3%
Far Cry 5 94
+51.6%
62
−51.6%
Forza Horizon 4 97
−89.7%
180−190
+89.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
−34.1%
170−180
+34.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−153%
157
+153%
Valorant 118
−125%
260−270
+125%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 117
−76.1%
200−210
+76.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−76%
130−140
+76%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−55.6%
300−350
+55.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
−41.9%
88
+41.9%
Metro Exodus 33
−418%
171
+418%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
−27.6%
290−300
+27.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
−55.3%
110−120
+55.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
−122%
60−65
+122%
Far Cry 5 67
+4.7%
64
−4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 77
−88.3%
140−150
+88.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−73.2%
95−100
+73.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75
−74.7%
130−140
+74.7%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
−123%
125
+123%
Metro Exodus 21
−162%
55
+162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
−130%
99
+130%
Valorant 180−190
−51.1%
280−290
+51.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 43
−81.4%
75−80
+81.4%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−155%
27−30
+155%
Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
−71.4%
60
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 51
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
−94.9%
75−80
+94.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
−172%
65−70
+172%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and Pro W6800 compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6800 is 32% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6800 is 97% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6800 is 115% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti is 95% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6800 is 418% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is ahead in 8 tests (13%)
  • Pro W6800 is ahead in 53 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.89 44.51
Recency 22 February 2019 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has 108.3% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800, on the other hand, has a 54.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6800 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon Pro W6800
Radeon Pro W6800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8398 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 83 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or Radeon Pro W6800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.