Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.47
+243%

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms HD 6990M Crossfire by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking147425
Place by popularity37not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.848.70
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTuring TU116Blackcomb XTX
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)12 July 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data
Current price$284 (1x MSRP)$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti has 197% better value for money than HD 6990M Crossfire.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362240
Core clock speed1500 MHz715 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million2x1700 Million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate169.9no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2x2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.47
+243%
HD 6990M Crossfire 9.75

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire by 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Ti 22892
+256%
HD 6990M Crossfire 6422

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire by 256% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Ti 61217
+138%
HD 6990M Crossfire 25759

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire by 138% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p300−350
+203%
99
−203%
Full HD104
−3.8%
108
+3.8%
1440p57
+256%
16−18
−256%
4K38
+280%
10−12
−280%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 86 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74 no data
Battlefield 5 130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 71 no data
Far Cry 5 104 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 112 no data
Forza Horizon 4 131 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 180 no data
Metro Exodus 134 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 119 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55 no data
Battlefield 5 121 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 57 no data
Far Cry 5 82 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 79 no data
Forza Horizon 4 218 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140 no data
Metro Exodus 103 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 103 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 127 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 46 no data
Far Cry 5 61 no data
Forza Horizon 4 97 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 102 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 97 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 82 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 36 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27 no data
Far Cry 5 67 no data
Forza Horizon 4 77 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75 no data
Metro Exodus 65 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 36 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 29 no data
Hitman 3 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 11 no data
Far Cry 5 20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 51 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 42 no data
Metro Exodus 35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 44 no data

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and HD 6990M Crossfire compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 203% faster in 900p
  • HD 6990M Crossfire is 4% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 256% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 280% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.47 9.75
Recency 22 February 2019 12 July 2011
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6928 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.