ATI Radeon DDR VIVO vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking197not rated
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.83no data
Power efficiency19.47no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameTU116Rage 6
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 February 2019 (6 years ago)14 August 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1500 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate169.91.098
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs966

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s5.856 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x VGA, 2x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2019 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 180 nm

GTX 1660 Ti has an age advantage of 17 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon DDR VIVO. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
ATI Radeon DDR VIVO
Radeon DDR VIVO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8969 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon DDR VIVO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or Radeon DDR VIVO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.