Radeon DDR VIVO vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 190 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 80 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 27.06 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Rage 6 (2000−2007) |
| GPU code name | TU116 | Rage 6 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 October 2019 (4 years ago) | 14 August 2001 (22 years ago) |
| Current price | $206 | $498 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 183 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 6,600 million | 30 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 138.0 | 1.098 |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 366 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 5.856 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x VGA, 2x S-Video |
| HDMI | + | no data |
Supported Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
| Multi Monitor | + | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 7.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | no data |
Pros & Cons Summary
| Recency | 29 October 2019 | 14 August 2001 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 180 nm |
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon DDR VIVO. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
