GeForce 7600 GT vs GTX 1660 Ti

Place in performance ranking	147	1172
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.84	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	Turing TU116	G73
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	22 February 2019 (5 years ago)	9 March 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	$199
Current price	$284 (1x MSRP)	$123 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti and 7600 GT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	no data
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	560 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	6,600 million	177 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	169.9	6.720

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.5	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.47
+5877%

7600 GT 0.56

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms 7600 GT by 5877% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Ti 12926
+5857%

7600 GT 217

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms 7600 GT by 5857% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	104 +10300%	1−2 −10300%
1440p	57	0−1
4K	38	0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4650−4700

+5862%

78
−5862%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5100−5150 +5830%	86 −5830%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4400−4450 +5846%	74 −5846%
Battlefield 5	7750−7800 +5862%	130 −5862%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5650−5700 +5847%	95 −5847%
Cyberpunk 2077	4200−4250 +5815%	71 −5815%
Far Cry 5	6200−6250 +5862%	104 −5862%
Far Cry New Dawn	6650−6700 +5838%	112 −5838%
Forza Horizon 4	7800−7850 +5854%	131 −5854%
Hitman 3	4100−4150 +5842%	65−70 −5842%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10750−10800 +5872%	180 −5872%
Metro Exodus	8000−8050 +5870%	134 −5870%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7100−7150 +5866%	119 −5866%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9300−9350 +5862%	156 −5862%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5150−5200 +5820%	85−90 −5820%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4300−4350 +5872%	72 −5872%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3250−3300 +5809%	55 −5809%
Battlefield 5	7200−7250 +5850%	121 −5850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5050−5100 +5841%	85 −5841%
Cyberpunk 2077	3400−3450 +5865%	57 −5865%
Far Cry 5	4900−4950 +5876%	82 −5876%
Far Cry New Dawn	4700−4750 +5849%	79 −5849%
Forza Horizon 4	13000−13050 +5863%	218 −5863%
Hitman 3	4100−4150 +5842%	65−70 −5842%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8000−8050 +5870%	130−140 −5870%
Metro Exodus	6150−6200 +5871%	103 −5871%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6150−6200 +5871%	103 −5871%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7550−7600 +5845%	127 −5845%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6900−6950 +5848%	116 −5848%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5150−5200 +5820%	85−90 −5820%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3150−3200 +5843%	53 −5843%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2950−3000 +5800%	50 −5800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4150−4200 +5829%	70 −5829%
Cyberpunk 2077	2700−2750 +5770%	46 −5770%
Far Cry 5	3600−3650 +5802%	61 −5802%
Forza Horizon 4	5750−5800 +5828%	97 −5828%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6050−6100 +5831%	102 −5831%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6550−6600 +5855%	110 −5855%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3700−3750 +5868%	62 −5868%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5150−5200 +5820%	85−90 −5820%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5750−5800

+5828%

97
−5828%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4450−4500 +5833%	75 −5833%
Far Cry New Dawn	4900−4950 +5876%	82 −5876%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2450−2500 +5876%	41 −5876%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2150−2200 +5872%	36 −5872%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3250−3300 +5809%	55 −5809%
Cyberpunk 2077	1600−1650 +5826%	27 −5826%
Far Cry 5	4000−4050 +5870%	67 −5870%
Forza Horizon 4	4600−4650 +5874%	77 −5874%
Hitman 3	2500−2550 +5852%	40−45 −5852%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4450−4500 +5833%	75 −5833%
Metro Exodus	3850−3900 +5823%	65 −5823%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4650−4700 +5862%	78 −5862%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2700−2750 +5770%	45−50 −5770%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1650−1700 +5793%	27−30 −5793%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3850−3900

+5823%

65
−5823%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2150−2200 +5872%	36 −5872%
Far Cry New Dawn	1700−1750 +5762%	29 −5762%
Hitman 3	1600−1650 +5826%	27−30 −5826%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2450−2500 +5876%	40−45 −5876%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1550−1600 +5862%	26 −5862%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2550−2600 +5830%	43 −5830%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1450−1500 +5700%	25 −5700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1100−1150 +5689%	19 −5689%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1450−1500 +5700%	25 −5700%
Cyberpunk 2077	650−700 +5809%	11 −5809%
Far Cry 5	1150−1200 +5650%	20 −5650%
Forza Horizon 4	3000−3050 +5782%	51 −5782%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2500−2550 +5852%	42 −5852%
Metro Exodus	2050−2100 +5757%	35 −5757%
Watch Dogs: Legion	950−1000 +5838%	16−18 −5838%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2600−2650

+5809%

44
−5809%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and 7600 GT compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti is 10300% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.47	0.56
Recency	22 February 2019	9 March 2006
Cost	$279	$199
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	40 Watt