FirePro V3900 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with FirePro V3900, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.47
+1916%

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms V3900 by a whopping 1916% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking157944
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.67no data
Power efficiency19.452.32
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTU116Turks
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)7 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536480
Core clock speed1500 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt199 Watt
Texture fill rate169.915.60
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS0.624 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs9624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datahalf height / half length
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s28 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.47
+1916%
FirePro V3900 1.66

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12913
+1918%
FirePro V3900 640

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1660 Ti 61065
+3804%
FirePro V3900 1564

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+1960%
5−6
−1960%
1440p60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%
4K37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.71no data
1440p4.65no data
4K7.54no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
+2500%
3−4
−2500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 86
+2050%
4−5
−2050%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
Battlefield 5 130
+2067%
6−7
−2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95
+2275%
4−5
−2275%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+2267%
3−4
−2267%
Far Cry 5 104
+1980%
5−6
−1980%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
+2140%
5−6
−2140%
Forza Horizon 4 231
+2210%
10−11
−2210%
Hitman 3 70−75
+2233%
3−4
−2233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+1971%
7−8
−1971%
Metro Exodus 134
+2133%
6−7
−2133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+2280%
5−6
−2280%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 171
+2038%
8−9
−2038%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+2300%
5−6
−2300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 122
+1933%
6−7
−1933%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Battlefield 5 121
+1917%
6−7
−1917%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85
+2025%
4−5
−2025%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
Far Cry 5 82
+1950%
4−5
−1950%
Far Cry New Dawn 79
+2533%
3−4
−2533%
Forza Horizon 4 218
+2080%
10−11
−2080%
Hitman 3 70−75
+2233%
3−4
−2233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+1971%
7−8
−1971%
Metro Exodus 114
+2180%
5−6
−2180%
Red Dead Redemption 2 89
+2125%
4−5
−2125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 127
+2017%
6−7
−2017%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+2233%
3−4
−2233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+2300%
5−6
−2300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+2550%
2−3
−2550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+2400%
2−3
−2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70
+2233%
3−4
−2233%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Far Cry 5 61
+1933%
3−4
−1933%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+2325%
4−5
−2325%
Hitman 3 70−75
+2233%
3−4
−2233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
+1940%
5−6
−1940%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110
+2100%
5−6
−2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+2300%
5−6
−2300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+2325%
4−5
−2325%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+2600%
2−3
−2600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 36
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Far Cry 5 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+1920%
10−11
−1920%
Hitman 3 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
Metro Exodus 65
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
+2500%
3−4
−2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+2075%
8−9
−2075%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65
+2067%
3−4
−2067%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Hitman 3 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+1938%
8−9
−1938%
Metro Exodus 46
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+2050%
2−3
−2050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 11 0−1
Far Cry 5 20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and FirePro V3900 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 1960% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 2900% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 3600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.47 1.66
Recency 22 February 2019 7 February 2012
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 199 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has a 1916.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 65.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V3900 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop card while FirePro V3900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 7662 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 96 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.