Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile with Quadro FX 4800, including specs and performance data.
1660 Ti Mobile outperforms FX 4800 by a whopping 987% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 250 | 885 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 31.74 | 0.02 |
| Power efficiency | 25.14 | 1.23 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | TU116 | GT200B |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 (6 years ago) | 11 November 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $1,799 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 158600% better value for money than FX 4800.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 6,600 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 152.6 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.884 TFLOPS | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 24 |
| TMUs | 96 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | 192 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 88
+1000%
| 8−9
−1000%
|
| 1440p | 58
+1060%
| 5−6
−1060%
|
| 4K | 35
+1067%
| 3−4
−1067%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 2.60
+8541%
| 224.88
−8541%
|
| 1440p | 3.95
+9013%
| 359.80
−9013%
|
| 4K | 6.54
+9065%
| 599.67
−9065%
|
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 8541% lower cost per frame in 1080p
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 9013% lower cost per frame in 1440p
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 9065% lower cost per frame in 4K
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 147
+1125%
|
12−14
−1125%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 86
+1129%
|
7−8
−1129%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 74
+1133%
|
6−7
−1133%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 111
+1010%
|
10−11
−1010%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 133
+1008%
|
12−14
−1008%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 68
+1033%
|
6−7
−1033%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 117
+1070%
|
10−11
−1070%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 93
+1063%
|
8−9
−1063%
|
| Fortnite | 120−130
+1170%
|
10−11
−1170%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 134
+1017%
|
12−14
−1017%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 62
+1140%
|
5−6
−1140%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+1078%
|
9−10
−1078%
|
| Valorant | 209
+1061%
|
18−20
−1061%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 103
+1044%
|
9−10
−1044%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 101
+1022%
|
9−10
−1022%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 260−270
+1013%
|
24−27
−1013%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 54
+1250%
|
4−5
−1250%
|
| Dota 2 | 121
+1110%
|
10−11
−1110%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 98
+989%
|
9−10
−989%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 89
+1013%
|
8−9
−1013%
|
| Fortnite | 120−130
+1170%
|
10−11
−1170%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 125
+1150%
|
10−11
−1150%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 105
+1067%
|
9−10
−1067%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 48
+1100%
|
4−5
−1100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 54
+1250%
|
4−5
−1250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+1078%
|
9−10
−1078%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 103
+1044%
|
9−10
−1044%
|
| Valorant | 207
+1050%
|
18−20
−1050%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 94
+1075%
|
8−9
−1075%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 52
+1200%
|
4−5
−1200%
|
| Dota 2 | 116
+1060%
|
10−11
−1060%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 90
+1025%
|
8−9
−1025%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 83
+1086%
|
7−8
−1086%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 99
+1000%
|
9−10
−1000%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35
+1067%
|
3−4
−1067%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 109
+990%
|
10−11
−990%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55
+1000%
|
5−6
−1000%
|
| Valorant | 125
+1150%
|
10−11
−1150%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 107
+1089%
|
9−10
−1089%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+1080%
|
5−6
−1080%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 180−190
+1075%
|
16−18
−1075%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 50−55
+1175%
|
4−5
−1175%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30
+1400%
|
2−3
−1400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+994%
|
16−18
−994%
|
| Valorant | 197
+994%
|
18−20
−994%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 69
+1050%
|
6−7
−1050%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 25
+1150%
|
2−3
−1150%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 52
+1200%
|
4−5
−1200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60
+1100%
|
5−6
−1100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+1067%
|
6−7
−1067%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−33
+1400%
|
2−3
−1400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+1000%
|
4−5
−1000%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 69
+1050%
|
6−7
−1050%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+1250%
|
2−3
−1250%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 50−55
+1200%
|
4−5
−1200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| Metro Exodus | 19
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35
+1067%
|
3−4
−1067%
|
| Valorant | 152
+1167%
|
12−14
−1167%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 38
+1167%
|
3−4
−1167%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+1250%
|
2−3
−1250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 85
+1114%
|
7−8
−1114%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 26
+1200%
|
2−3
−1200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 31
+1450%
|
2−3
−1450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+1075%
|
4−5
−1075%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+1350%
|
2−3
−1350%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 30−33
+1400%
|
2−3
−1400%
|
This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and FX 4800 compete in popular games:
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 1000% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 1060% faster in 1440p
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 1067% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 26.19 | 2.41 |
| Recency | 23 April 2019 | 11 November 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1536 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 986.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4800 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 4800 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
