HD Graphics 400 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile with HD Graphics 400, including specs and performance data.
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 2233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 189 | 1041 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 30.51 | no data |
Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) |
GPU code name | N18E-G0 | Braswell GT1 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 April 2015 (9 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | no data |
Current price | $682 (3x MSRP) | $710 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and HD Graphics 400 have a nearly equal value for money.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 320 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 640 MHz |
Number of transistors | 6,600 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 6 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 152.6 | 7.680 |
Floating-point performance | no data | 134.4 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and HD Graphics 400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3L |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 7.5 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 400 by 2233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 400 by 3193% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 86
+2767%
| 3−4
−2767%
|
1440p | 58
+2800%
| 2−3
−2800%
|
4K | 37
+3600%
| 1−2
−3600%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 86
+2767%
|
3−4
−2767%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 80
+2567%
|
3−4
−2567%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 66
+3200%
|
2−3
−3200%
|
Battlefield 5 | 129
+2480%
|
5−6
−2480%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 82
+2633%
|
3−4
−2633%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 68
+3300%
|
2−3
−3300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 98
+2350%
|
4−5
−2350%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 102
+2450%
|
4−5
−2450%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 134
+2580%
|
5−6
−2580%
|
Hitman 3 | 77
+2467%
|
3−4
−2467%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 143
+2283%
|
6−7
−2283%
|
Metro Exodus | 126
+2420%
|
5−6
−2420%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 99
+2375%
|
4−5
−2375%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 147
+2350%
|
6−7
−2350%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 82
+2633%
|
3−4
−2633%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 69
+3350%
|
2−3
−3350%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 49
+2350%
|
2−3
−2350%
|
Battlefield 5 | 109
+2625%
|
4−5
−2625%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 73
+2333%
|
3−4
−2333%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 54
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
Far Cry 5 | 77
+2467%
|
3−4
−2467%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 70
+2233%
|
3−4
−2233%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 256
+2460%
|
10−11
−2460%
|
Hitman 3 | 65
+3150%
|
2−3
−3150%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 207
+2488%
|
8−9
−2488%
|
Metro Exodus | 94
+2250%
|
4−5
−2250%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88
+2833%
|
3−4
−2833%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 118
+2260%
|
5−6
−2260%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 103
+2475%
|
4−5
−2475%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 214
+2278%
|
9−10
−2278%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 53
+2550%
|
2−3
−2550%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 42
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 53
+2550%
|
2−3
−2550%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 52
+2500%
|
2−3
−2500%
|
Far Cry 5 | 57
+2750%
|
2−3
−2750%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 99
+2375%
|
4−5
−2375%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 90
+2900%
|
3−4
−2900%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 101
+2425%
|
4−5
−2425%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55
+2650%
|
2−3
−2650%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 33
+3200%
|
1−2
−3200%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80
+2567%
|
3−4
−2567%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 66
+3200%
|
2−3
−3200%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 72
+2300%
|
3−4
−2300%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 36
+3500%
|
1−2
−3500%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 32
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 51
+2450%
|
2−3
−2450%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 25
+2400%
|
1−2
−2400%
|
Far Cry 5 | 60
+2900%
|
2−3
−2900%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+2550%
|
2−3
−2550%
|
Hitman 3 | 41
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 65
+3150%
|
2−3
−3150%
|
Metro Exodus | 60
+2900%
|
2−3
−2900%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
+2850%
|
2−3
−2850%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+3200%
|
1−2
−3200%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 23 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 56
+2700%
|
2−3
−2700%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 31
+3000%
|
1−2
−3000%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 25
+2400%
|
1−2
−2400%
|
Hitman 3 | 25
+2400%
|
1−2
−2400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+3000%
|
1−2
−3000%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24
+2300%
|
1−2
−2300%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35
+3400%
|
1−2
−3400%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 22 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 13 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 19 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 18 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+3500%
|
1−2
−3500%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 37
+3600%
|
1−2
−3600%
|
Metro Exodus | 32
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 13 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27
+2600%
|
1−2
−2600%
|
This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 2767% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 2800% faster in 1440p
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 3600% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 26.36 | 1.13 |
Recency | 23 April 2019 | 1 April 2015 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 6 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while HD Graphics 400 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.