GeForce GT 440 vs GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	202	900
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	0.08
Power efficiency	24.91	2.14
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	TU116	GF108
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)	1 February 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	$79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 124900% better value for money than GT 440.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	96
Core clock speed	1455 MHz	810 MHz
Boost clock speed	1590 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	6,600 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	98 °C
Texture fill rate	152.6	12.96
Floating-point processing power	4.884 TFLOPS	0.311 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	96	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Standard memory config per GPU	no data	1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5)
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	HDMIVGADual Link DVI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 27.99
+1335%

GT 440 1.95

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 14818
+1643%

GT 440 850

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	89 +1383%	6−7 −1383%
1440p	57 +1800%	3−4 −1800%
4K	36 +1700%	2−3 −1700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.57 +412%	13.17 −412%
1440p	4.02 +555%	26.33 −555%
4K	6.36 +521%	39.50 −521%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 412% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 555% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 521% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	63 +1475%	4−5 −1475%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 +1620%	5−6 −1620%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	89 +1383%	6−7 −1383%
Counter-Strike 2	54 +1700%	3−4 −1700%
Cyberpunk 2077	63 +1475%	4−5 −1475%
Forza Horizon 4	147 +1370%	10−11 −1370%
Forza Horizon 5	69 +1625%	4−5 −1625%
Metro Exodus	88 +1367%	6−7 −1367%
Red Dead Redemption 2	99 +1550%	6−7 −1550%
Valorant	148 +1380%	10−11 −1380%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	112 +1500%	7−8 −1500%
Counter-Strike 2	49 +1533%	3−4 −1533%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 +1567%	3−4 −1567%
Dota 2	111 +1486%	7−8 −1486%
Far Cry 5	75 +1400%	5−6 −1400%
Fortnite	130−140 +1444%	9−10 −1444%
Forza Horizon 4	118 +1375%	8−9 −1375%
Forza Horizon 5	60 +1400%	4−5 −1400%
Grand Theft Auto V	105 +1400%	7−8 −1400%
Metro Exodus	63 +1475%	4−5 −1475%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	232 +1350%	16−18 −1350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	41 +1950%	2−3 −1950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +1500%	6−7 −1500%
Valorant	71 +1675%	4−5 −1675%
World of Tanks	270−280 +1406%	18−20 −1406%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	78 +1460%	5−6 −1460%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +1733%	3−4 −1733%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 +1400%	3−4 −1400%
Dota 2	116 +1350%	8−9 −1350%
Far Cry 5	119 +1388%	8−9 −1388%
Forza Horizon 4	101 +1343%	7−8 −1343%
Forza Horizon 5	50 +1567%	3−4 −1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +1620%	10−11 −1620%
Valorant	125 +1463%	8−9 −1463%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	50−55 +1567%	3−4 −1567%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +1600%	3−4 −1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +1358%	12−14 −1358%
Red Dead Redemption 2	26 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
World of Tanks	180−190 +1467%	12−14 −1467%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55 +1733%	3−4 −1733%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +1367%	6−7 −1367%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +1480%	5−6 −1480%
Forza Horizon 5	42 +2000%	2−3 −2000%
Metro Exodus	60 +1400%	4−5 −1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +1400%	3−4 −1400%
Valorant	81 +1520%	5−6 −1520%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Dota 2	50−55 +1633%	3−4 −1633%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +1633%	3−4 −1633%
Metro Exodus	19 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90 +1400%	6−7 −1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +1633%	3−4 −1633%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	10	0−1
Dota 2	85 +1600%	5−6 −1600%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +1850%	2−3 −1850%
Fortnite	37 +1750%	2−3 −1750%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +1400%	3−4 −1400%
Forza Horizon 5	22 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Valorant	39 +1850%	2−3 −1850%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GT 440 compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 1383% faster in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 1800% faster in 1440p
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 1700% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	27.99	1.95
Recency	23 April 2019	1 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	65 Watt