GeForce GT 220 vs GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile with GeForce GT 220, including specs and performance data.
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 4874% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 238 | 1262 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 33.81 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 25.10 | 0.70 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | TU116 | GT216 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 (6 years ago) | 12 October 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $79.99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GT 220 have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 6,600 million | 486 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 58 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Texture fill rate | 152.6 | 9.840 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.884 TFLOPS | 0.1277 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 8 |
| TMUs | 96 | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | no data | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 790 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 25.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | VGADVIHDMI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | S/PDIF + HDA |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 88
+319%
| 21
−319%
|
| 1440p | 58
+5700%
| 1−2
−5700%
|
| 4K | 35 | 0−1 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 2.60
+46.4%
| 3.81
−46.4%
|
| 1440p | 3.95
+1926%
| 79.99
−1926%
|
| 4K | 6.54 | no data |
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 46% lower cost per frame in 1080p
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1926% lower cost per frame in 1440p
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 147
+7250%
|
2−3
−7250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 86
+8500%
|
1−2
−8500%
|
| God of War | 55−60
+1080%
|
5−6
−1080%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 111
+5450%
|
2−3
−5450%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 133
+6550%
|
2−3
−6550%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 68
+6700%
|
1−2
−6700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 93 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 120−130
+6300%
|
2−3
−6300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 134
+2580%
|
5−6
−2580%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 100
+4900%
|
2−3
−4900%
|
| God of War | 66
+1220%
|
5−6
−1220%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+1225%
|
8−9
−1225%
|
| Valorant | 209
+674%
|
27−30
−674%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 103
+5050%
|
2−3
−5050%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 101
+4950%
|
2−3
−4950%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 260−270
+1471%
|
16−18
−1471%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 54
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| Dota 2 | 121
+1000%
|
10−12
−1000%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 89 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 120−130
+6300%
|
2−3
−6300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 125
+2400%
|
5−6
−2400%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 90
+8900%
|
1−2
−8900%
|
| God of War | 52
+940%
|
5−6
−940%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 105
+5150%
|
2−3
−5150%
|
| Metro Exodus | 54 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+1225%
|
8−9
−1225%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 103
+1617%
|
6−7
−1617%
|
| Valorant | 207
+667%
|
27−30
−667%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 94
+9300%
|
1−2
−9300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 52
+5100%
|
1−2
−5100%
|
| Dota 2 | 116
+955%
|
10−12
−955%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 83 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 99
+1880%
|
5−6
−1880%
|
| God of War | 35
+600%
|
5−6
−600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 109
+1263%
|
8−9
−1263%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55
+817%
|
6−7
−817%
|
| Valorant | 125
+363%
|
27−30
−363%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 107
+5250%
|
2−3
−5250%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+1867%
|
3−4
−1867%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 180−190
+9350%
|
2−3
−9350%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 50−55
+4900%
|
1−2
−4900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+2817%
|
6−7
−2817%
|
| Valorant | 197
+6467%
|
3−4
−6467%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 69
+6800%
|
1−2
−6800%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 25 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 60
+5900%
|
1−2
−5900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+3400%
|
2−3
−3400%
|
| God of War | 28 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 69
+6800%
|
1−2
−6800%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 50−55
+240%
|
14−16
−240%
|
| Metro Exodus | 19 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 152
+4967%
|
3−4
−4967%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 38 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 85
+8400%
|
1−2
−8400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 31 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| God of War | 18 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
+1400%
|
2−3
−1400%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 30−33
+1400%
|
2−3
−1400%
|
This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GT 220 compete in popular games:
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 319% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 5700% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 9350% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 1660 Ti Mobile surpassed GT 220 in all 31 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 26.36 | 0.53 |
| Recency | 23 April 2019 | 12 October 2009 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 58 Watt |
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 4873.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
GT 220, on the other hand, has 37.9% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 220 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
