GeForce 7150M vs GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GeForce 7150M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
28.23
+56360%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms 7150M by a whopping 56360% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2031488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency24.78no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU116C67
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)1 February 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363
Core clock speed1455 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate152.6no data
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6shared Memory
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)shared Memory
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90-0−1
1440p60-0−1
4K38-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.54no data
1440p3.82no data
4K6.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 109
+10800%
1−2
−10800%
Counter-Strike 2 63
+800%
7−8
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+8500%
1−2
−8500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 81
+8000%
1−2
−8000%
Battlefield 5 111 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 54
+671%
7−8
−671%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
Far Cry 5 93 0−1
Fortnite 120−130 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 134
+6600%
2−3
−6600%
Forza Horizon 5 69 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+1683%
6−7
−1683%
Valorant 209
+771%
24−27
−771%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Battlefield 5 103 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 49
+600%
7−8
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+2867%
9−10
−2867%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Dota 2 121
+1413%
8−9
−1413%
Far Cry 5 89 0−1
Fortnite 120−130 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 125
+6150%
2−3
−6150%
Forza Horizon 5 60 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 105 0−1
Metro Exodus 54 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+1683%
6−7
−1683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+3333%
3−4
−3333%
Valorant 207
+763%
24−27
−763%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 94 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+686%
7−8
−686%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Dota 2 116
+1350%
8−9
−1350%
Far Cry 5 83 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 99
+4850%
2−3
−4850%
Forza Horizon 5 50 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+1717%
6−7
−1717%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Valorant 125
+421%
24−27
−421%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55 0−1
Metro Exodus 30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 197 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 25 0−1
Far Cry 5 60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 42 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+4500%
1−2
−4500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+247%
14−16
−247%
Metro Exodus 19 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35 0−1
Valorant 152
+15100%
1−2
−15100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10 0−1
Dota 2 85 0−1
Far Cry 5 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 15100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 Ti Mobile surpassed GeForce 7150M in all 31 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.23 0.05
Recency 23 April 2019 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 12 nm 90 nm

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 56360% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7150M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce 7150M
GeForce 7150M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1612 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 28 votes

Rate GeForce 7150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or GeForce 7150M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.