ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTU116BCedar
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2019 (6 years ago)1 April 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153680
Core clock speed1455 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data17 Watt
Texture fill rate152.64.000
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs968
L1 Cache1.5 MBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2019 1 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh and FirePro 2460 Multi-View. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh is a notebook graphics card while FirePro 2460 Multi-View is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
FirePro 2460 Multi-View

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 59 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate FirePro 2460 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh or FirePro 2460 Multi-View, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.