ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking353not rated
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency26.16no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTU117Cedar
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 April 2020 (5 years ago)1 April 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102480
Core clock speed1380 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rate99.844.000
Floating-point processing power3.195 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs648
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 April 2020 1 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 17 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 2460 Multi-View, on the other hand, has 194.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and FirePro 2460 Multi-View. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while FirePro 2460 Multi-View is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
FirePro 2460 Multi-View

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3883 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate FirePro 2460 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile or FirePro 2460 Multi-View, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.