Iris Plus Graphics vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
21.03
+390%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Iris Plus Graphics by a whopping 390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking286694
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.66no data
Power efficiency26.7121.80
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameTU116Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (6 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536512
Core clock speed1140 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1335 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate128.232.00
Floating-point processing power4.101 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs9632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 21.03
+390%
Iris Plus Graphics 4.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+391%
Iris Plus Graphics 1796

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD79
+394%
16−18
−394%
4K33
+450%
6−7
−450%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.90no data
4K6.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+408%
24−27
−408%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
God of War 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+419%
16−18
−419%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+408%
24−27
−408%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Far Cry 5 69
+393%
14−16
−393%
Fortnite 92
+411%
18−20
−411%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+438%
16−18
−438%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
God of War 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+419%
16−18
−419%
Valorant 150−160
+417%
30−33
−417%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+457%
14−16
−457%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+408%
24−27
−408%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+444%
45−50
−444%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Dota 2 94
+422%
18−20
−422%
Far Cry 5 66
+450%
12−14
−450%
Fortnite 90
+400%
18−20
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+438%
16−18
−438%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
God of War 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+444%
16−18
−444%
Metro Exodus 48
+433%
9−10
−433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+419%
16−18
−419%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+411%
18−20
−411%
Valorant 150−160
+417%
30−33
−417%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+421%
14−16
−421%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Dota 2 86
+438%
16−18
−438%
Far Cry 5 62
+417%
12−14
−417%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+438%
16−18
−438%
God of War 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+419%
16−18
−419%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+410%
10−11
−410%
Valorant 93
+417%
18−20
−417%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 79
+394%
16−18
−394%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+413%
30−33
−413%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+397%
35−40
−397%
Valorant 190−200
+446%
35−40
−446%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+444%
9−10
−444%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
God of War 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+457%
7−8
−457%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+417%
6−7
−417%
Valorant 120−130
+417%
24−27
−417%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+443%
7−8
−443%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Dota 2 70−75
+414%
14−16
−414%
Far Cry 5 30
+400%
6−7
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
God of War 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 394% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 450% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.03 4.29
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a 390.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 586 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 453 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.