Radeon R5 A240 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Super and Radeon R5 A240, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
33.12
+2108%

GTX 1660 Super outperforms R5 A240 by a whopping 2108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking164981
Place by popularity9not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation57.82no data
Power efficiency18.272.07
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Oland
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 October 2019 (5 years ago)2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408320
Core clock speed1530 MHz1030 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz780 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate157.115.60
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPSno data
ROPs488
TMUs8820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGA
HDMI++
HDCP+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+-
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.56.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.12
+2108%
R5 A240 1.50

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Super 12729
+2110%
R5 A240 576

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
+2175%
4−5
−2175%
1440p55
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
4K30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.52no data
1440p4.16no data
4K7.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+2433%
3−4
−2433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 92
+2200%
4−5
−2200%
Counter-Strike 2 62
+3000%
2−3
−3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Forza Horizon 4 163
+2229%
7−8
−2229%
Forza Horizon 5 96
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
Metro Exodus 108
+2600%
4−5
−2600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+2567%
3−4
−2567%
Valorant 143
+2283%
6−7
−2283%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+2250%
4−5
−2250%
Counter-Strike 2 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Dota 2 166
+2271%
7−8
−2271%
Far Cry 5 147
+2350%
6−7
−2350%
Fortnite 150−160
+2450%
6−7
−2450%
Forza Horizon 4 129
+2480%
5−6
−2480%
Forza Horizon 5 67
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+2117%
6−7
−2117%
Metro Exodus 73
+2333%
3−4
−2333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 233
+2230%
10−11
−2230%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+2160%
5−6
−2160%
Valorant 77
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
World of Tanks 270−280
+2208%
12−14
−2208%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 79
+2533%
3−4
−2533%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Dota 2 211
+2244%
9−10
−2244%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+2125%
4−5
−2125%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+2140%
5−6
−2140%
Forza Horizon 5 67
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+2225%
8−9
−2225%
Valorant 122
+2340%
5−6
−2340%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 62
+3000%
2−3
−3000%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+3000%
2−3
−3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 162
+2214%
7−8
−2214%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
World of Tanks 210−220
+2256%
9−10
−2256%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+2525%
4−5
−2525%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+2567%
3−4
−2567%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Metro Exodus 67
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Valorant 73
+2333%
3−4
−2333%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16 0−1
Dota 2 60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%
Metro Exodus 22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 101
+2425%
4−5
−2425%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Cyberpunk 2077 11 0−1
Dota 2 95
+2275%
4−5
−2275%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Fortnite 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Forza Horizon 4 44
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Forza Horizon 5 22 0−1
Valorant 34
+3300%
1−2
−3300%

This is how GTX 1660 Super and R5 A240 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is 2175% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 2650% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 2900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.12 1.50
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1660 Super has a 2108% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

R5 A240, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 A240 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
AMD Radeon R5 A240
Radeon R5 A240

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 20959 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.