GeForce GTX 750 vs GTX 1660 Super

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Super and GeForce GTX 750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
33.13
+282%

GTX 1660 Super outperforms GTX 750 by a whopping 282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking164498
Place by popularity987
Cost-effectiveness evaluation57.174.52
Power efficiency18.2510.86
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameTU116GM107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 October 2019 (5 years ago)18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Super has 1165% better value for money than GTX 750.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408512
Core clock speed1530 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rate157.134.72
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPS1.111 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs8832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm145 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI++
HDCP++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
3D Vision Live-+
NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.13
+282%
GTX 750 8.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Super 12736
+282%
GTX 750 3338

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Super 15995
+303%
GTX 750 3970

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1660 Super 62606
+576%
GTX 750 9266

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1660 Super 60424
+608%
GTX 750 8534

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1660 Super 65044
+523%
GTX 750 10448

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
+333%
21−24
−333%
1440p55
+293%
14−16
−293%
4K30
+329%
7−8
−329%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.52
+125%
5.67
−125%
1440p4.16
+104%
8.50
−104%
4K7.63
+123%
17.00
−123%
  • GTX 1660 Super has 125% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super has 104% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Super has 123% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90
+329%
21−24
−329%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+322%
18−20
−322%
Elden Ring 93
+288%
24−27
−288%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 92
+283%
24−27
−283%
Counter-Strike 2 62
+288%
16−18
−288%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+321%
14−16
−321%
Forza Horizon 4 163
+308%
40−45
−308%
Metro Exodus 108
+300%
27−30
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+344%
18−20
−344%
Valorant 143
+309%
35−40
−309%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+292%
24−27
−292%
Counter-Strike 2 52
+333%
12−14
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+308%
12−14
−308%
Dota 2 166
+315%
40−45
−315%
Elden Ring 96
+300%
24−27
−300%
Far Cry 5 147
+320%
35−40
−320%
Fortnite 150−160
+283%
40−45
−283%
Forza Horizon 4 129
+330%
30−33
−330%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+343%
30−33
−343%
Metro Exodus 73
+306%
18−20
−306%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 233
+288%
60−65
−288%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+330%
10−11
−330%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+319%
27−30
−319%
Valorant 77
+328%
18−20
−328%
World of Tanks 270−280
+296%
70−75
−296%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 79
+339%
18−20
−339%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+300%
12−14
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+340%
10−11
−340%
Dota 2 211
+284%
55−60
−284%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+324%
21−24
−324%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+315%
27−30
−315%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+313%
45−50
−313%
Valorant 122
+307%
30−33
−307%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 62
+288%
16−18
−288%
Elden Ring 56
+300%
14−16
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+288%
16−18
−288%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 162
+305%
40−45
−305%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
World of Tanks 210−220
+285%
55−60
−285%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+300%
14−16
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+314%
7−8
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+317%
6−7
−317%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+289%
27−30
−289%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+344%
18−20
−344%
Metro Exodus 67
+319%
16−18
−319%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+286%
14−16
−286%
Valorant 73
+306%
18−20
−306%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
Dota 2 60
+329%
14−16
−329%
Elden Ring 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+329%
14−16
−329%
Metro Exodus 22
+340%
5−6
−340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 101
+321%
24−27
−321%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+329%
14−16
−329%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+314%
7−8
−314%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Dota 2 95
+296%
24−27
−296%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+283%
12−14
−283%
Fortnite 40−45
+340%
10−11
−340%
Forza Horizon 4 44
+340%
10−11
−340%
Valorant 34
+325%
8−9
−325%

This is how GTX 1660 Super and GTX 750 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is 333% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 293% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 329% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.13 8.68
Recency 29 October 2019 18 February 2014
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 1660 Super has a 281.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 750, on the other hand, has 127.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GeForce GTX 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 20813 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2365 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.