GRID M40 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Super with GRID M40, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
28.71
+662%

GTX 1660 Super outperforms GRID M40 by a whopping 662% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking204722
Place by popularity9not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.94no data
Power efficiency18.486.07
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameTU116GM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 October 2019 (5 years ago)18 May 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408384
Core clock speed1530 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate157.133.06
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPS0.7933 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs8832
L1 Cache1.4 MB192 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA7.55.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD89
+790%
10−12
−790%
1440p55
+686%
7−8
−686%
4K30
+900%
3−4
−900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.57no data
1440p4.16no data
4K7.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 285
+714%
35−40
−714%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+744%
9−10
−744%
Hogwarts Legacy 88
+780%
10−11
−780%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 97
+708%
12−14
−708%
Counter-Strike 2 243
+710%
30−33
−710%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+688%
8−9
−688%
Far Cry 5 112
+700%
14−16
−700%
Fortnite 140−150
+683%
18−20
−683%
Forza Horizon 4 144
+700%
18−20
−700%
Forza Horizon 5 108
+671%
14−16
−671%
Hogwarts Legacy 65
+713%
8−9
−713%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+669%
16−18
−669%
Valorant 321
+703%
40−45
−703%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+730%
10−11
−730%
Counter-Strike 2 119
+750%
14−16
−750%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+686%
35−40
−686%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+767%
6−7
−767%
Dota 2 231
+670%
30−33
−670%
Far Cry 5 103
+758%
12−14
−758%
Fortnite 140−150
+683%
18−20
−683%
Forza Horizon 4 135
+744%
16−18
−744%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+683%
12−14
−683%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+731%
16−18
−731%
Hogwarts Legacy 51
+750%
6−7
−750%
Metro Exodus 56
+700%
7−8
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139
+672%
18−20
−672%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113
+707%
14−16
−707%
Valorant 290
+729%
35−40
−729%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 77
+670%
10−11
−670%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+717%
6−7
−717%
Dota 2 211
+681%
27−30
−681%
Far Cry 5 95
+692%
12−14
−692%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+664%
14−16
−664%
Hogwarts Legacy 27
+800%
3−4
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 104
+767%
12−14
−767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+663%
8−9
−663%
Valorant 122
+663%
16−18
−663%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+683%
18−20
−683%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 67
+738%
8−9
−738%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+696%
27−30
−696%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+675%
8−9
−675%
Metro Exodus 36
+800%
4−5
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 162
+671%
21−24
−671%
Valorant 262
+773%
30−33
−773%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+757%
7−8
−757%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+767%
3−4
−767%
Far Cry 5 65
+713%
8−9
−713%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+740%
10−11
−740%
Hogwarts Legacy 39
+680%
5−6
−680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+671%
7−8
−671%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+670%
10−11
−670%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+757%
7−8
−757%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Metro Exodus 22
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+700%
5−6
−700%
Valorant 132
+725%
16−18
−725%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+800%
4−5
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Dota 2 95
+692%
12−14
−692%
Far Cry 5 33
+725%
4−5
−725%
Forza Horizon 4 54
+671%
7−8
−671%
Hogwarts Legacy 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+800%
4−5
−800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%

This is how GTX 1660 Super and GRID M40 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is 790% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 686% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.71 3.77
Recency 29 October 2019 18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1660 Super has a 661.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

GRID M40, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M40 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a desktop graphics card while GRID M40 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 23449 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 8 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Super or GRID M40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.