Arc 140V Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 313 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 4 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 29.95 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 19.11 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Xe2-LPG (2024) |
| GPU code name | TU117 | Lunar Lake |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 (6 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1950 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,700 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 93.24 | 124.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.984 TFLOPS | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 April 2019 | 24 September 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 37 Watt |
Arc 140V Mobile has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 102.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 and Arc 140V Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop graphics card while Arc 140V Mobile is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
