RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	282	25
Place by popularity	63	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	40.33	1.71
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	N18P-G0, N18P-G61	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)	9 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price	$301	$5296

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Mobile has 2258% better value for money than RTX 5000 Ada Generation.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	12800
Core clock speed	1380 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	99.84	1,020

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5, GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 18.43

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 63.46
+244%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile by 244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 24507
+244%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile by 244% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	57 −233%	190−200 +233%
1440p	37 −224%	120−130 +224%
4K	23 −226%	75−80 +226%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−271%

52
+271%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −293%	55 +293%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −250%	42 +250%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −286%	81 +286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −264%	51 +264%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −310%	41 +310%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −267%	66 +267%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −276%	79 +276%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −290%	82 +290%
Hitman 3	12−14 −292%	47 +292%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −247%	104 +247%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −290%	82 +290%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −294%	71 +294%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −276%	79 +276%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −300%	48 +300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −300%	48 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −300%	24 +300%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −289%	70 +289%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −292%	47 +292%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −256%	32 +256%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −279%	53 +279%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −286%	54 +286%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −270%	148 +270%
Hitman 3	10−11 −290%	39 +290%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −270%	148 +270%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −281%	61 +281%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −281%	61 +281%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −256%	64 +256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −244%	62 +244%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −253%	141 +253%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −275%	30 +275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −300%	8 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −278%	34 +278%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −275%	30 +275%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −300%	40 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −244%	62 +244%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −256%	57 +256%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −293%	55 +293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −260%	36 +260%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −325%	17 +325%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−271%

52
+271%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −258%	43 +258%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −300%	48 +300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −267%	22 +267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −271%	26 +271%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −275%	15 +275%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −250%	35 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −260%	35−40 +260%
Hitman 3	7−8 −271%	26 +271%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −267%	44 +267%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −290%	39 +290%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −300%	12 +300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−267%

+267%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −250%	21 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −325%	17 +325%
Hitman 3	4−5 −250%	14 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −275%	15 +275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −250%	21 +250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −300%	12 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5 +400%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −300%	12 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −283%	23 +283%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −280%	19 +280%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−325%

+325%

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 233% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 224% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 226% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.43	63.46
Recency	23 April 2019	9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	250 Watt