Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile with Radeon RX 7900 GRE, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
20.28

RX 7900 GRE outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking27421
Place by popularity62not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.14
Power efficiency27.9918.55
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU116Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2020 (4 years ago)27 July 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10245120
Core clock speed1350 MHz1287 MHz
Boost clock speed1485 MHz2245 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate95.04718.4
Floating-point processing power3.041 TFLOPS45.98 TFLOPS
ROPs32160
TMUs64320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28
RX 7900 GRE 69.91
+245%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
RX 7900 GRE 26879
+245%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
RX 7900 GRE 67134
+406%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
RX 7900 GRE 122732
+182%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
RX 7900 GRE 54610
+450%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
RX 7900 GRE 247366
+280%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191
RX 7900 GRE 637522
+55.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
−254%
209
+254%
1440p43
−205%
131
+205%
4K25
−224%
81
+224%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.63
1440pno data4.19
4Kno data6.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
−293%
160−170
+293%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
−253%
208
+253%
Elden Ring 57
−214%
179
+214%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
−98.3%
110−120
+98.3%
Counter-Strike 2 36
−358%
160−170
+358%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−130%
92
+130%
Forza Horizon 4 95
−413%
487
+413%
Metro Exodus 66
−126%
149
+126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
−189%
120−130
+189%
Valorant 98
−259%
350−400
+259%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−82.8%
110−120
+82.8%
Counter-Strike 2 30
−450%
160−170
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
−147%
79
+147%
Dota 2 90
−82.2%
164
+82.2%
Elden Ring 73
−270%
270−280
+270%
Far Cry 5 70
−42.9%
100
+42.9%
Fortnite 100−110
−157%
270−280
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 75
−437%
403
+437%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
−116%
164
+116%
Metro Exodus 45
−207%
138
+207%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−58.1%
210−220
+58.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
−338%
120−130
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−172%
170−180
+172%
Valorant 48
−633%
350−400
+633%
World of Tanks 230−240
−19.7%
270−280
+19.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
−125%
110−120
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−358%
160−170
+358%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
−155%
74
+155%
Dota 2 112
−213%
350−400
+213%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−97%
130−140
+97%
Forza Horizon 4 63
−460%
353
+460%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−58.1%
210−220
+58.1%
Valorant 80−85
−329%
350−400
+329%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
−306%
130
+306%
Elden Ring 30−35
−444%
180−190
+444%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−294%
130
+294%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−1.7%
170−180
+1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
−429%
90−95
+429%
World of Tanks 130−140
−259%
450−500
+259%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
−112%
85−90
+112%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−447%
90−95
+447%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
−206%
49
+206%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−191%
160−170
+191%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−385%
252
+385%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−178%
128
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−457%
156
+457%
Valorant 50−55
−485%
300−350
+485%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−412%
85−90
+412%
Dota 2 30−35
−344%
151
+344%
Elden Ring 14−16
−553%
95−100
+553%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−344%
151
+344%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−373%
71
+373%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−243%
200−210
+243%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−369%
60−65
+369%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−344%
151
+344%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 22
−314%
90−95
+314%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−412%
85−90
+412%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−267%
22
+267%
Dota 2 52
−227%
170−180
+227%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−304%
100−110
+304%
Fortnite 24−27
−300%
95−100
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−337%
131
+337%
Valorant 24−27
−629%
170−180
+629%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and RX 7900 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE is 254% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 205% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 224% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7900 GRE is 633% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7900 GRE surpassed GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.28 69.91
Recency 23 April 2020 27 July 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 420% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 GRE, on the other hand, has a 244.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1716 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 857 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.