Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	277	401
Place by popularity	62	not in top-100
Power efficiency	27.97	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	TU116	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)	April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	768
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	1366 MHz
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	95.04	no data
Floating-point processing power	3.041 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	64	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	84 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Multi-Projection	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	no data
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.140	+
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28
+62.9%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.45

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+55.1%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 +65.7%	35−40 −65.7%
1440p	43 +79.2%	24−27 −79.2%
4K	25 +78.6%	14−16 −78.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	42 +75%	24−27 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 +68.6%	35−40 −68.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	59 +68.6%	35−40 −68.6%
Counter-Strike 2	36 +71.4%	21−24 −71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	95 +72.7%	55−60 −72.7%
Forza Horizon 5	68 +70%	40−45 −70%
Metro Exodus	66 +65%	40−45 −65%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +63%	27−30 −63%
Valorant	98 +63.3%	60−65 −63.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +82.9%	35−40 −82.9%
Counter-Strike 2	30 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +77.8%	18−20 −77.8%
Dota 2	90 +63.6%	55−60 −63.6%
Far Cry 5	70 +75%	40−45 −75%
Fortnite	100−110 +64.6%	65−70 −64.6%
Forza Horizon 4	75 +66.7%	45−50 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	45 +66.7%	27−30 −66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	76 +68.9%	45−50 −68.9%
Metro Exodus	45 +66.7%	27−30 −66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +70%	80−85 −70%
Red Dead Redemption 2	29 +81.3%	16−18 −81.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +82.9%	35−40 −82.9%
Valorant	48 +77.8%	27−30 −77.8%
World of Tanks	230−240 +66.4%	140−150 −66.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 +73.3%	30−33 −73.3%
Counter-Strike 2	25 +78.6%	14−16 −78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	29 +81.3%	16−18 −81.3%
Dota 2	112 +72.3%	65−70 −72.3%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +70%	40−45 −70%
Forza Horizon 4	63 +80%	35−40 −80%
Forza Horizon 5	47 +74.1%	27−30 −74.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +70%	80−85 −70%
Valorant	80−85 +64%	50−55 −64%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +77.8%	18−20 −77.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +72%	100−105 −72%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +70%	10−11 −70%
World of Tanks	130−140 +71.3%	80−85 −71.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +70.8%	24−27 −70.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +77.8%	9−10 −77.8%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +83.3%	30−33 −83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +73.3%	30−33 −73.3%
Forza Horizon 5	28 +75%	16−18 −75%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +70.4%	27−30 −70.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +81.3%	16−18 −81.3%
Valorant	50−55 +73.3%	30−33 −73.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Dota 2	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +74.3%	35−40 −74.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +100%	3−4 −100%
Dota 2	52 +73.3%	30−33 −73.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Fortnite	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	14 +75%	8−9 −75%
Valorant	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 66% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 79% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 79% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.28	12.45
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 62.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 136433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.