Quadro NVS 285 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1509 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.43 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | TU106 | NV44 A2 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 June 2020 (5 years ago) | 6 June 2006 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $27.99 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 275 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | 75 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 18 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 89.04 | 1.100 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.849 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | 2 |
| TMUs | 56 | 4 |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 14 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DMS-59 |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 June 2020 | 6 June 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 18 Watt |
GTX 1650 TU106 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.
NVS 285, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and Quadro NVS 285. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 285 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
