FirePro D700 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.60
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTU106Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 June 2020 (5 years ago)18 January 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962048
Core clock speed1410 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt274 Watt
Texture fill rate89.04108.8
Floating-point processing power2.849 TFLOPS3.482 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs56128
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores14no data
L1 Cache896 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1370 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s263.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2020 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 274 Watt

GTX 1650 TU106 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 204.4% lower power consumption.

FirePro D700, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and FirePro D700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro D700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 303 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 38 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 or FirePro D700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.