Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with Quadro P3200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
26.44
+12.1%

GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms P3200 Max-Q by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking210240
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Power efficiency18.2421.69
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU116GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed1530 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1404 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0157.2
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPS5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.56.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.44
+12.1%
P3200 Max-Q 23.58

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10166
+12.1%
P3200 Max-Q 9066

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
1440p36
+20%
30−35
−20%
4K23
+27.8%
18−21
−27.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 61
+22%
50−55
−22%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Elden Ring 76
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+14.3%
70−75
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+20%
40−45
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+21%
100−105
−21%
Metro Exodus 89
+18.7%
75−80
−18.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+20%
70−75
−20%
Valorant 115
+15%
100−105
−15%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+14.3%
70−75
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Dota 2 138
+15%
120−130
−15%
Elden Ring 82
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%
Far Cry 5 151
+16.2%
130−140
−16.2%
Fortnite 130−140
+18.2%
110−120
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+12.2%
90−95
−12.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+14.4%
90−95
−14.4%
Metro Exodus 61
+22%
50−55
−22%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+16.4%
140−150
−16.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+16%
75−80
−16%
Valorant 100−110
+17.8%
90−95
−17.8%
World of Tanks 260−270
+14.3%
230−240
−14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+14.3%
70−75
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Dota 2 191
+12.4%
170−180
−12.4%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+12.9%
70−75
−12.9%
Forza Horizon 4 83
+18.6%
70−75
−18.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+16.4%
140−150
−16.4%
Valorant 100−110
+17.8%
90−95
−17.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Elden Ring 31
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+16.7%
150−160
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
World of Tanks 170−180
+16%
150−160
−16%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Counter-Strike 2 20
+25%
16−18
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+20%
65−70
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 60
+20%
50−55
−20%
Metro Exodus 55
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Valorant 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Dota 2 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Elden Ring 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+15.7%
70−75
−15.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 80
+14.3%
70−75
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Fortnite 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Valorant 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 17% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 20% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 28% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.44 23.58
Recency 22 November 2019 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 1650 SUPER has a 12.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

P3200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4821 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 21 vote

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.