GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro K510M

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
2.64
 
no data
Architecture
Turing
 
Kepler
GPU code name
TU116
 
GK208
Market segment
Desktop
 
Mobile workstation
Launch date
29 October 2019 (1 year ago)
 
23 July 2013 (7 years ago)
Price now
$530
 
no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
1408
 
192
Core clock speed
1530 MHz
 
846 MHz
Boost clock speed
1725 MHz
 
no data
Number of transistors
6,600 million
 
915 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
 
28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
100 Watt
 
30 Watt
Texture fill rate
138.0
 
13.54
Floating-point performance
no data
 
324.9 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Quadro K510M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size
no data
 
medium sized
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
MXM-A (3.0)
Length
229 mm
 
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
 
no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR6
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
1 GB
Memory bus width
128 Bit
 
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
 
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
 
19.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 
No outputs
HDMI
+
 
-
Display Port
no data
 
1.2

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus
-
 
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
 
+
Mosaic
no data
 
+
VR Ready
+
 
no data
nView Display Management
no data
 
+
Optimus
no data
 
+
Multi Monitor
+
 
no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 (12_1)
 
12
Shader Model
6.5
 
5
OpenGL
4.6
 
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
 
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
1.1.126
CUDA
7.5
 
+

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 37.43 +1527.4%
Quadro K510M 2.30

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 9908 +1524.3%
Quadro K510M 610

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

GTX 1650 SUPER satisfies 100% minimum and 97% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
100%
Recommended
97%
Minimum
100%
Recommended
97%

Quadro K510M satisfies 70% minimum and 60% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
70%
Recommended
60%
Minimum
70%
Recommended
60%

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

 
GTX 1650 SUPER
Quadro K510M
1080p
 
74
no data
1440p
 
41
no data
4K
 
27
no data

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER from AMD

The nearest GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's AMD equivalent is Radeon R9 FURY X, which is faster by 2% and higher by 2 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER:

Competitors of Quadro K510M from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro K510M from AMD is FirePro M2000, which is slower by 32% and lower by 108 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K510M:

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

1527.4% faster (about 16.5 times) in synthetic tests

Much newer (29 October 2019 vs 23 July 2013)

Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)

More pipelines (1408 vs 192)

Higher memory bandwidth (192 vs 19.2 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 28 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Lower power consumption (30W vs 100W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)

PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)

CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)

Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, since it shows better performance.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.