GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro K510M
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Quadro K510M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
GTX 1650 SUPER satisfies 100% minimum and 97% recommended requirements of all games known to us.
Quadro K510M satisfies 70% minimum and 60% recommended requirements of all games known to us.
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER from AMD
The nearest GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's AMD equivalent is Radeon R9 FURY X, which is faster by 2% and higher by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER:
Competitors of Quadro K510M from AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro K510M from AMD is FirePro M2000, which is slower by 32% and lower by 108 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K510M:
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
1527.4% faster (about 16.5 times) in synthetic tests
Much newer (29 October 2019 vs 23 July 2013)
Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)
More pipelines (1408 vs 192)
Higher memory bandwidth (192 vs 19.2 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 28 nm)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Lower power consumption (30W vs 100W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, which one is the better GPU?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, since it shows better performance.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.