GeForce GTX 950M vs GTX 1650 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with GeForce GTX 950M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
25.45
+295%

GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms GTX 950M by a whopping 295% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking225582
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency18.016.09
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameTU116GM107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280640
Core clock speed1530 MHz914 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate138.044.96
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPS1.439 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3 or GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1000 or 2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s32 or 80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
VGA аnalog display supportno data+
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno data+
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GeForce ShadowPlay-+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorks-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
BatteryBoost-+
VR Ready+no data
Anselno data+
Multi Monitor+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 SUPER 25.45
+295%
GTX 950M 6.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10168
+294%
GTX 950M 2578

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 SUPER 18225
+317%
GTX 950M 4367

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1650 SUPER 64463
+310%
GTX 950M 15710

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 SUPER 12206
+281%
GTX 950M 3200

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 SUPER 68199
+219%
GTX 950M 21356

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1650 SUPER 55805
+473%
GTX 950M 9743

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 SUPER 653824
+229%
GTX 950M 198867

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1650 SUPER 53337
+680%
GTX 950M 6837

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1650 SUPER 56481
+478%
GTX 950M 9777

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
+127%
30
−127%
1440p35
+66.7%
21
−66.7%
4K21
+40%
15
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 248
+727%
30−33
−727%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+385%
12−14
−385%
Hogwarts Legacy 72
+500%
12−14
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+132%
31
−132%
Counter-Strike 2 201
+570%
30−33
−570%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+285%
12−14
−285%
Far Cry 5 93
+304%
23
−304%
Fortnite 120−130
+86.2%
65
−86.2%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+250%
27−30
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 93
+447%
16−18
−447%
Hogwarts Legacy 54
+350%
12−14
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+273%
26
−273%
Valorant 160−170
+140%
70−75
−140%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 58
+123%
26
−123%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+220%
30−33
−220%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+151%
100−110
−151%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+208%
12−14
−208%
Dota 2 209
+186%
73
−186%
Far Cry 5 86
+310%
21
−310%
Fortnite 120−130
+404%
24
−404%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+250%
27−30
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 82
+382%
16−18
−382%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+415%
20
−415%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
+242%
12−14
−242%
Metro Exodus 51
+920%
5
−920%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+322%
21−24
−322%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+374%
19
−374%
Valorant 160−170
+140%
70−75
−140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 57
+185%
20
−185%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+162%
12−14
−162%
Dota 2 191
+185%
67
−185%
Far Cry 5 79
+316%
19
−316%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+250%
27−30
−250%
Hogwarts Legacy 33
+175%
12−14
−175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+322%
21−24
−322%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+355%
11
−355%
Valorant 160−170
+140%
70−75
−140%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+450%
22
−450%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 52
+420%
10−11
−420%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+263%
45−50
−263%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+463%
8−9
−463%
Metro Exodus 29
+383%
6−7
−383%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+361%
35−40
−361%
Valorant 200−210
+192%
70−75
−192%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+320%
10−11
−320%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+300%
5−6
−300%
Far Cry 5 54
+350%
12
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+327%
14−16
−327%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
+214%
7−8
−214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+356%
9−10
−356%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+362%
12−14
−362%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+150%
18−20
−150%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Metro Exodus 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+700%
4−5
−700%
Valorant 140−150
+353%
30−35
−353%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24
+380%
5−6
−380%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 80
+264%
21−24
−264%
Far Cry 5 24
+300%
6
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+389%
9−10
−389%
Hogwarts Legacy 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and GTX 950M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 127% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 67% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 40% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hogwarts Legacy, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 SUPER is 1500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1650 SUPER surpassed GTX 950M in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.45 6.45
Recency 22 November 2019 13 March 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 1650 SUPER has a 294.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 950M, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 950M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 950M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GeForce GTX 950M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4994 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1155 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or GeForce GTX 950M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.