560M SLI vs 1650 SUPER

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy
SLI

Combined performance score

GTX 1650 SUPER
26.17
+306%

1650 SUPER outperforms 560M SLI by 306% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking189537
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Value for money27.043.99
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTU116N12E-GS
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years old)6 January 2011 (13 years old)
Current price$206 $149
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 SUPER has 578% better value for money than GTX 560M SLI.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280384
Core clock speed1530 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 560M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.17
+306%
GTX 560M SLI 6.44

1650 SUPER outperforms 560M SLI by 306% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1650 SUPER 64463
+269%
GTX 560M SLI 17484

1650 SUPER outperforms 560M SLI by 269% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1650 SUPER 18218
+404%
GTX 560M SLI 3616

1650 SUPER outperforms 560M SLI by 404% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72
+350%
16−18
−350%
1440p36
+350%
8−9
−350%
4K22
+340%
5−6
−340%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 63
+530%
10−11
−530%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+292%
12−14
−292%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+563%
8−9
−563%
Battlefield 5 72
+243%
21−24
−243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+263%
18−20
−263%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+400%
10−11
−400%
Far Cry 5 93
+520%
14−16
−520%
Far Cry New Dawn 89
+456%
16−18
−456%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+295%
21−24
−295%
Hitman 3 105
+600%
14−16
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+469%
12−14
−469%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+492%
12−14
−492%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85
+467%
14−16
−467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
+610%
10−11
−610%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+292%
12−14
−292%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+225%
8−9
−225%
Battlefield 5 58
+176%
21−24
−176%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+263%
18−20
−263%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+300%
10−11
−300%
Far Cry 5 86
+473%
14−16
−473%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
+419%
16−18
−419%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+295%
21−24
−295%
Hitman 3 83
+453%
14−16
−453%
Horizon Zero Dawn 58
+346%
12−14
−346%
Metro Exodus 51
+467%
9−10
−467%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+150%
12−14
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
+347%
14−16
−347%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+592%
12−14
−592%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
+510%
10−11
−510%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+292%
12−14
−292%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Battlefield 5 57
+171%
21−24
−171%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+240%
10−11
−240%
Far Cry 5 79
+427%
14−16
−427%
Far Cry New Dawn 76
+375%
16−18
−375%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+295%
21−24
−295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+285%
12−14
−285%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+110%
10−11
−110%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+310%
10−11
−310%
Hitman 3 51
+410%
10−11
−410%
Horizon Zero Dawn 39
+200%
12−14
−200%
Metro Exodus 29
+480%
5−6
−480%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+175%
4−5
−175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
+344%
9−10
−344%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Battlefield 5 42
+740%
5−6
−740%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+567%
3−4
−567%
Far Cry 5 54
+440%
10−11
−440%
Far Cry New Dawn 55
+588%
8−9
−588%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+600%
2−3
−600%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Hitman 3 25
+317%
6−7
−317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5
−60%
8−9
+60%
Metro Exodus 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+850%
2−3
−850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+967%
3−4
−967%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 24
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 24
+300%
6−7
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
+250%
8−9
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+517%
6−7
−517%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8
+700%
1−2
−700%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and GTX 560M SLI compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 350% faster than GTX 560M SLI

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 350% faster than GTX 560M SLI

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 340% faster than GTX 560M SLI

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 SUPER is 1500% faster than the GTX 560M SLI.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 560M SLI is 60% faster than the GTX 1650 SUPER.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • GTX 560M SLI is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 26.17 6.44
Recency 29 October 2019 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 100 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M SLI
GeForce GTX 560M SLI

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4064 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.