GTX 1650 SUPER vs 210

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
not rated
Value for money (0-100)
2.65
 
no data
Architecture
Turing
 
Tesla 2.0
GPU code name
TU116
 
GT218
Market segment
Desktop
 
Desktop
Launch date
29 October 2019 (1 year ago)
 
12 October 2009 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
 
$29.49
Price now
$539
 
$63

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
1408
 
16
CUDA cores
no data
 
16
Core clock speed
1530 MHz
 
589 MHz
Boost clock speed
1725 MHz
 
no data
Number of transistors
6,600 million
 
260 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
 
40 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
100 Watt
 
30.5 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature
no data
 
105 °C
Texture fill rate
138.0
 
4.160
Floating-point performance
no data
 
39.36 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support
no data
 
PCI-E 2.0
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 2.0 x16
Length
229 mm
 
6.60" (16.8 cm)
Height
no data
 
2.731" (6.9 cm)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR6
 
GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
512 MB
Memory bus width
128 Bit
 
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
 
500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
 
8.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA
Display Connectors
no data
 
DVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor support
no data
 
+
HDMI
+
 
+
Maximum VGA resolution
no data
 
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
no data
 
Internal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready
+
 
no data
Multi Monitor
+
 
no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 (12_1)
 
11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model
6.5
 
4.1
OpenGL
4.6
 
3.1
OpenCL
1.2
 
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
N/A
CUDA
7.5
 
+

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 9926 +10239.6%
GeForce 210 96

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER from AMD is Radeon R9 FURY X.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER:

Competitors of GeForce 210 from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce 210 from AMD is Radeon HD 8310E.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 210:

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Much newer (29 October 2019 vs 12 October 2009)

Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)

More pipelines (1408 vs 16)

Higher memory bandwidth (192 vs 8 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 40 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210

Cheaper ($63 vs $539)

Lower power consumption (30W vs 100W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce 210. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce 210
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.