ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1781605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.12no data
Power efficiency16.78no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGP104RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2016 (9 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1607 MHz239 MHz
Boost clock speed1771 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt28 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate283.40.96
Floating-point processing power9.068 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1604
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s164 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s5.248 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115no data
1440p71no data
4K55no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.35no data
1440p7.04no data
4K9.09no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 115 no data
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 91 no data
Fortnite 143 no data
Forza Horizon 4 108 no data
Forza Horizon 5 100−110 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 no data
Valorant 188 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 112 no data
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Dota 2 130−140 no data
Far Cry 5 117 no data
Fortnite 201 no data
Forza Horizon 4 106 no data
Forza Horizon 5 100−110 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 119 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 no data
Metro Exodus 73 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142 no data
Valorant 186 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 102 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Dota 2 120 no data
Far Cry 5 108 no data
Forza Horizon 4 102 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 91 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 no data
Valorant 137 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 44 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 183 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 86 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 74 no data
Forza Horizon 4 87 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 88 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 76 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51 no data
Valorant 178 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 52 no data
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 100−105 no data
Far Cry 5 40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 61 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 42 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2016 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 1080 Mobile has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 435.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Radeon 9200 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 380 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile or Radeon 9200 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.