ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	471	1605
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	10.82	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	GP107B	RV280
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	3 January 2017 (8 years ago)	1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1354 MHz	239 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	28 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	59.72	0.96
Floating-point processing power	1.911 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	40	4
L1 Cache	240 KB	no data
L2 Cache	1024 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	4000 MB	128 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	164 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	5.248 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDCP	2.2	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
Ansel	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	8.1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.5	1.4
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	73	no data
Full HD	46	no data
1440p	24	no data
4K	15	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	3 January 2017	1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount	4000 MB	128 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	28 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---